Who will win the battle of the IoT standards?

20th February 2015
Source: GreenPeak
Posted By : Nat Bowers
Who will win the battle of the IoT standards?

There is a great deal of overlap and confusion when it comes to IoT standards. Device developers and design engineers understandably have lots of questions. Cees Links, CEO, GreenPeak Technologies, has written a whitepaper covering who is doing what and why it matters, guiding readers through the various layers to try and make sense of it all.

This whitepaper provides an overview of the most important contenders around the IoT wireless communication standards. For the sake of argument, and to keep it simple, the cellular standards have been left out, although they do play an important role in the IoT (and the so-called M2M business). RFID, which can be quite useful for the IoT for security purposes, but is less contentious as it is more of an electronic bar code replacement than a means for real (two-way) communication, has also been excluded.

Also for simplicity, the proprietary pseudo standards like ANT+, Z-Wave and EnOcean have been cut. This is for the simple reason that, like other 'non-standard' proprietary standards, they will not be able to survive against industry accepted international standards in the long run.

These IoT connectivity solutions can be split up into three horizontal (combinations of) layers:

  1. the Physical/Link Layer (the connector)
  2. the Network/Transport Layer (the wireless cable)
  3. the Application Layer (who is doing what to whom)

Download and read the the full whitepaper below.

Downloads


You must be logged in to comment

Write a comment

No comments




Sign up to view our publications

Sign up

Sign up to view our downloads

Sign up

IoT Solutions World Congress 2018
16th October 2018
Spain Barcelona
The Security Event 2019
9th April 2019
United Kingdom NEC, Birmingham